Biography Nikolai Asmolov

But it was not false for sure ”The conversation of the correspondent Irina Lesnichenko with the ex-president of the Public Fund of Eurasia Nikolai Kazykizbekovich Asmolov. Nikolai Asmolov: Indeed, after that ill -fated “plum” an interview with Oleg Vladimirovich Deripaska into the Ukrainian network, everything went somersault. And it all started just fabulously. We were promised a good budget, good analysts were selected in many Central Asian countries, and the editorial board of the ballot in Astana and Moscow was formed.

The first issue of the ballot was released by the circulation of copies, the second received applications from subscribers. We made copies and sent them out. They were sorted out to become an Eurasian “expert”, and even better than them, because the “expert” is focused on the middle audience, our readers were supposed only to VIP. And suddenly - this boom on our head ... I. for example, the situation is fictitious or not - everyone decides for himself.

But this is not the main thing, even if somewhere they write that all this is the "fruit of the fantasy of the authors." The false text or not - this is also in the end everyone decides on their own. If we tell the truth about the important - we will not be fake for sure. Without guilt, the guilty I. and why is Germany now? During the period of the year to January of the year, we did not feel anything.

And then, in February, we just stopped payments, I had to go around, large troubles, claims began. Everything lay on me personally. They seemed to be forgotten about the promised money. Our people did not receive a salary, the rental of offices, printing house, other very difficult problems appeared ... I. Firstly, my wife’s relatives in Germany did not immediately raise money for moving.

Documents were drawn up for departure, for permanent residence. Secondly, I didn’t want to leave, I thought everything would settle down. And then suddenly my former deputy, Slava Ostalsky, recklessly gave an interview to Ukrainian journalist Natalya Prokopchuk. It seems, for the Kyiv newspaper "Facts and Comments", I do not remember for sure. At that moment I had no contact with him, and I could not dissuade him from this step.

Glory spoke anonymously, but he, a good economic analyst, was completely inexperienced in politics. He believed that we needed to publicly fight, as if he had reproached me for cowardice - they threw us, used it, and we wiped us. I have not seen a chance of winning in this way. But they are also full of representatives here, the process of Russian mafiosi in Stuttgart showed this.

It is unlikely that this was the only one, Izmailovsky, a person, many are probably “mothballed”. When they promise so much after such a pressure - it is very dangerous, a bad sign. I needed to get away from them, and I did not object, although I did not believe any word. Of course not. Therefore, I am free from obligations. But maybe Oleg Vladimirovich reported that everyone was given.

They took the cassettes with an interview, of course, I did not have a round fool, I gave copies, I also have copies, the original, and they are hidden in reliable people. True, I was forced to record on the video camera a confession that I myself composed an interview without the participation of Oleg Vladimirovich. I categorically refused, said that I would do it only when I get the money and go abroad without obstacles.

I have already prepared for the new round of pressure, but unexpectedly these gentlemen retreated, they said they were arranged.

I left the project, but I had to be silent in any case, completely disappeared from the field of view of the public. If the Bazel PR company did not work, who repel the authenticity of the interview, I would have to bear the role of the inventor of this material. This role would be worked out without me, the main thing - I had to be silent. Why do you insist on the authenticity of the interview?

One FSBSHNIK - “Free analyst, anti -compromise” published Panegirik, allegedly that Mikhail lived all that was all. Another “analyst”, it seems, Surkovsky, confidently stated that everything was coming from the intrigues of the US State Department. There was a lot of even more primitive black PR. On the site is compromising evidence. It seems that the audience was convinced of fake, everything was supposed to calm down.

But they began to draw me to contacts to Russia, I understand so, not to drink tea. And not for turning at the cashier for the fee. I became an unnecessary, unwanted witness. Nothing else. I am not going to take revenge on anyone. I still treat Oleg Vladimirovich with great respect, he is a real leader of the nation. Unfortunately, it is sometimes “leaded” by people with low professional qualifications, sometimes from personal self -interest.

Sometimes he is substituted by the Kremlin self -loving officials. If I had been given me to leave with sufficient funds at one time - now everything would be quiet. The threat is always stronger than the performance of I. How can you maintain respect for Deripaska after all this, and what really happened to this interview? Let's start with the second, the first flows from it.

I’ll tell you about what still few people know. In the year, a real quiet conspiracy was matured in the Kremlin and Zatrevelysky circles. Its essence was to free the new, born elite with KGB roots from the overwhelming influence of powerful economic structures, and put these structures under the control of the new elite of the “security forces”.That is, turn over the situation.

Very strong pressure on Russian President Vladimir Putin went, and he is a pragmatist, a flexible person, he considers to rake up against Mayn-Star to rake up. I must say, the point of view about the change of power strategy has become widespread, immigrants from the KGB founded in almost all megaprojects of Russia, they put pressure on the country's economy and policy.

It was very dangerous. The tail cannot turn the dog. It was impossible to allow such a change in the roles of elites. People with a Chekist mind warehouse do not know how to think economically, in state affairs they think exclusively ambitiously and costly, like the old Politburo of the Central Committee of the CPSU. This over time, after the end of a favorable oil conjuncture, could lead to the second bankruptcy and collapse of the country.

The Chekists, in general, of course, smart people, but because of their professional mentality, they did not understand where they were leading society. In addition, many governors, under which by that time the chair was pumped, stood in the position of the “new wave”, they, with a successful conjuncture, dreamed of regaining their election and adding sovereignty to the regions.

At this moment, they arranged a meeting with Oleg Vladimirovich Deripaska. He explained the goals and objectives of the new project. My task was to show representatives of the elites that only megacorporations with the concentration of resources are able to give Russia an increase in space, first economic, then cultural, to strengthen our national influence and national stability.

The next step was to assume the quite honorable and necessary role to the immigrants of the power structures as an intra -system controller, but not the main player. And, most importantly, the task was set to support the president on the right course, to fence him out of the harmful influence of former colleagues. To help him recall the obligations in relation to Boris Nikolayevich Yeltsin, to help understand that Main-Stim of large economic structures will not let anyone change.

This is a matter of big money and big blood. I get money and start the project. After that, we write down the interview with Oleg Perenimirovich within two nights. Three more nights are, PRARS and GIRARS go in circles, they are not in business. They only set tasks and draw a program. Finally, the text is agreed. Oleg Vladimirovich, by the way, insisted on the phrase - “This is only for your ballot, other questions and answers will be appropriate for newspapers and the Internet ...” I asked him the question - it is unrealistic that it would not leak out anywhere, why give it?

Oleg Vladimirovich answered very harshly - this cannot be my care, I have to send five hundred copies according to the list, and that’s all. Then he thought and said - you can give more than five hundred if you are interested in people. Only bring the list of newsletters. I brought the list and handed it through his “assistant”, who then took me out in the car.

Maybe the new list did not get where necessary ... 85 copies of the ballot, and not 6, as Glory said, he did not know about the additional circulation. In general, I think the text was filled with anew on our printed instance in a hurry, so there are flaws. Our corrector was quite decent, we followed the Russian language. In the public version with such a wide audience coverage, the text acquired a completely different sound than was planned at first, the PR managers told me that the errors were introduced, as it were, “special” PR.

In general, instead of a point ji-ar promotion, there was noise to heaven, translations into foreign languages ​​and all that other. Apparently, Bazel had to include a larger budget than planned to disavow the authorship of the interview according to the existing plan. Despite these small flaws, Oleg Vladimirovich Deripaska is still brilliant. Now, look, his style began to repeat.

For example, Stepashin recently made the same way - he said about the war of the Chekist clans that he wanted, and did not seem to say, disavowed authorship.